Large TFSA overcontribution lands taxpayer in bother with the CRA

Article content material

Juliet as soon as mentioned, “A rose by every other title would odor as candy.” However would the tax-free financial savings account (TFSA) be as widespread as it’s with out its “tax-free” descriptor?

Article content material

In all probability not, in keeping with a brand new paper, “Tax-Free”: The Impact of a Heuristic Cue on the Selection Between a TFSA and an RRSP, printed earlier this month within the Canadian Tax Journal. The authors investigated whether or not a heuristic cue, particularly, the time period “tax-free” causes particular person traders to desire contributing to a TFSA, moderately than to a registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP). They performed three experiments to check this proposition, and concluded that people have a transparent choice for a tax-sheltered financial savings plan with tax-free in its title, no matter whether or not a TFSA is, certainly, the higher retirement financial savings automobile for them.

Article content material

As I’ve typically mentioned on this column, the selection of whether or not to contribute to a TFSA or RRSP (assuming you don’t have adequate funds to do each) will typically come right down to your tax fee right now versus your anticipated tax fee upon retirement (or withdrawal.)

Article content material

The tax fee for a lot of Canadians upon retirement shall be decrease than it was once they had been working, suggesting that the financial savings plan of alternative for many must be the RRSP, which supplies a tax deduction right now at a excessive(er) fee, and an revenue inclusion upon withdrawal at a low(er) fee.

However for lower-income Canadians, it’s possible higher to pay some tax right now at a low fee on their revenue, after which save these after-tax funds in a TFSA, the place they will develop tax free and be taken out at any time, tax free, when one’s tax fee could also be increased.

The authors of the paper mentioned the TFSA has prior to now decade turn into extra widespread than the RRSP, with whole annual TFSA contributions surpassing whole annual RRSP contributions every year since 2013. However the recognition of the TFSA has additionally led to some taxpayers getting penalized by the Canada Income Company (CRA) for overcontributing.

Article content material

Article content material

Take the latest case involving a taxpayer who in 2020 considerably overcontributed to his TFSA to the tune of $639,308 by drawing on his line of credit score and investing the borrowed funds into shares inside his TFSA.

Beneath the Revenue Tax Act, there’s a penalty of 1 per cent per thirty days for every month there’s a TFSA overcontribution. Accordingly, the taxpayer in July 2021 was reassessed and charged an overcontribution tax of $6,393.08, which is one per cent of the overcontributed quantity, presumably relating to 1 month (December 2020) of overcontribution tax. He was additionally charged penalties and curiosity.

The act, nonetheless, permits the CRA discretion to grant aid, and states that the company might waive or cancel the penalty tax if the surplus arose via “cheap error,” and is corrected by the person “directly.”

Article content material

Shortly after receiving his reassessment, the taxpayer contacted the CRA and defined it was his first time utilizing a TFSA and that he “was unaware of the way it labored.” He additional blamed his monetary establishment, which “didn’t inform him of the relevant guidelines.” When advised by a CRA agent to right away withdraw all the surplus contributions from his TFSA, the taxpayer responded that his investments had been down 35 per cent and that he would withdraw the cash “as quickly because the market improved.”

The next month, he adopted up with a letter formally requesting the penalty tax be cancelled. In describing his “tough monetary scenario,” he famous he was making an attempt to supply for his household and pay his mortgage all whereas being on incapacity as a consequence of a office accident. By this level, his investments had been down by “about 50 per cent.”

Article content material

He adopted up with a second letter in October 2021 and mentioned his portfolio was “now down about 45 per cent and that he’s not ready” to withdraw the overcontributions, however promised to take action “as quickly as issues get higher together with his investments.”

At this level, the CRA wrote to the taxpayer and mentioned it had reviewed his scenario and seen the elimination of all extra TFSA contributions didn’t happen, so it refused to cancel the overcontribution tax.

The taxpayer requested a second-level overview, which was additionally denied. The taxpayer then took the matter to Federal Court docket, the place the choose’s position is to find out whether or not the CRA officer’s refusal to train their discretion to disclaim the taxpayer aid was “cheap.”

Article content material

As in prior circumstances, an inexpensive resolution is one that’s “based mostly on an internally coherent and rational chain of study and that’s justified in relation to the information and regulation that constrain the choice maker.” Typically, a CRA resolution just isn’t put aside except it incorporates “sufficiently critical shortcomings … such that it can’t be mentioned to exhibit the requisite diploma of justification, intelligibility and transparency.”

Upon reviewing the information of the case, the choose discovered it “questionable” whether or not the taxpayer’s vital overcontribution was the results of an inexpensive error for the reason that taxpayer made no enquiries as to how TFSAs labored earlier than making a really vital overcontribution. The choose additionally mentioned that even when it was an inexpensive error, the taxpayer selected to not withdraw his overcontribution when he was first notified of it by the CRA, thus failing to fulfill the requirement to take action “directly.”

Article content material

The choose cited a previous case that famous “the CRA just isn’t answerable for the character of the investments made by (a taxpayer) in his TFSA. He alone bears that danger. (The taxpayer) has determined to keep away from financial loss in his TFSA however in doing so can not then search discretionary aid from the tax imposed on his extra quantity.”

Consequently, the choose concluded the CRA’s resolution to disclaim aid was cheap, as was its rationalization and justification for doing so. The choose noticed no cause to intervene.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

_____________________________________________________________

If you happen to preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________