The Monetary Conduct Authority has issued a £1.8m tremendous to former Barclays CEO James Staley in addition to banning him from holding a senior administration or affect perform within the monetary providers business.
The regulator mentioned Mr Staley “recklessly authorised” a letter despatched by Barclays to the FCA, which contained two deceptive statements in regards to the nature of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and the purpose of their final contact.
Therese Chambers, joint government director of enforcement and market oversight on the FCA mentioned:“A CEO must train sound judgement and set an instance to workers at their agency. Mr Staley failed to do that. We think about that he misled each the FCA and the Barclays Board in regards to the nature of his relationship with Mr Epstein.
“Mr Staley is an skilled business skilled and held a distinguished place inside monetary providers. It’s proper to forestall him from holding a senior place within the monetary providers business if we can not depend on him to behave with integrity by disclosing uncomfortable truths about his shut private relationship with Mr Epstein.”
In August 2019, the FCA requested Barclays to elucidate what it had executed to fulfill itself that there was no impropriety within the relationship between Mr Staley and Mr Epstein. In its response, Barclays relied on data equipped by Mr Staley. In line with the regulator, Mr Staley confirmed the letter was honest and correct.
The letter claimed that Mr Staley didn’t have a detailed relationship with Mr Epstein.
The regulator mentioned that in actuality, in emails between the 2 seen by the FCA, Mr Staley described Mr Epstein as considered one of his “deepest” and “most cherished” associates.
{loadposition hidden2}
The letter from Barclays to the FCA additionally claimed Mr Staley ceased contact with Mr Epstein effectively earlier than he joined Barclays. Nevertheless, Mr Staley was in touch with Mr Epstein within the days main as much as his appointment as CEO being introduced on 28 October 2015.
Mr Staley joined Barclays in December 2015.
The regulator mentioned that whereas Mr Staley didn’t draft the letter, there was no excuse for his failure to right the deceptive statements when he was the one particular person at Barclays who knew the complete extent of his private relationship with Mr Epstein and the precise timings of his contact with him.
The FCA added that it has discovered that Mr Staley was conscious of the chance that his affiliation with Mr Epstein posed to his profession and that, in failing to right the deceptive statements within the letter, “Mr Staley recklessly misled the FCA and acted with a scarcity of integrity”.
Mr Staley has referred his Determination Discover to the Higher Tribunal the place he’ll current his case.
{loadmoduleid 444}